PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNJ vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JNJ vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has outperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 10.06%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.25% annualized return.


JNJ

1D
-0.26%
1M
5.50%
YTD
13.43%
6M
16.43%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.06%

AGNC

1D
-0.59%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
3.01%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
6.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JNJ vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
13.43%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
-0.32%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%13.31%-2.46%23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between JNJ and AGNC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JNJ:

$567.68B

AGNC:

$11.35B

EPS

JNJ:

$8.65

AGNC:

$1.33

PE Ratio

JNJ:

26.85

AGNC:

7.60

PEG Ratio

JNJ:

0.89

AGNC:

0.02

PS Ratio

JNJ:

5.86

AGNC:

4.66

PB Ratio

JNJ:

6.99

AGNC:

1.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

JNJ:

$96.36B

AGNC:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JNJ:

$66.60B

AGNC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

JNJ:

$31.62B

AGNC:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNJ vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JNJ vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JNJAGNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.25

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

1.48

+3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

4.39

+10.13

JNJ vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNJ and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JNJAGNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

1.43

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.06

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.25

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.42

+0.11

Drawdowns

JNJ vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, smaller than the maximum AGNC drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNJAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.67%

-54.56%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-18.71%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-31.04%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

-54.36%

+35.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

-54.56%

+27.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-12.19%

+6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-13.56%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

6.30%

-2.60%

Volatility

JNJ vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) at 4.92%. This indicates that JNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNJAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

4.92%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

15.96%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

19.38%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

25.82%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

25.39%

-6.92%

Dividends

JNJ vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than AGNC's 14.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
14.24%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.26%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

JNJ vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
24.06B
0
(JNJ) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


JNJ and AGNC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to AGNC (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNJ and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer