JEPQ vs. ITB
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 20.04%/yr vs 6.44%/yr for ITB. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for ITB.
Performance
JEPQ vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's -3.71% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITB
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -7.66%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
JEPQ vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.44% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -3.71% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and ITB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.50 |
The correlation between JEPQ and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JEPQ vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JEPQ
ITB
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
Technology
JEPQ
ITB
-
Communication Services
JEPQ
ITB
-
Consumer Cyclical
JEPQ
ITB
Consumer Defensive
JEPQ
ITB
-
Healthcare
JEPQ
ITB
-
Industrials
JEPQ
ITB
Utilities
JEPQ
ITB
-
Basic Materials
JEPQ
ITB
Energy
JEPQ
ITB
-
Financial Services
JEPQ
ITB
-
Real Estate
JEPQ
ITB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
ITB
JEPQ vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEPQ | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.05 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 0.13 | +2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 0.25 | +14.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEPQ | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 0.11 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.11 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -86.53% | +66.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -26.04% | +17.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -33.35% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -27.00% | +24.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -37.10% | +33.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 13.28% | -11.47% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 3.65%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 7.16% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 20.24% | -10.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 29.41% | -17.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 29.19% | -12.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 30.00% | -13.33% |
JEPQ vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEPQ vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than ITB's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.23% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.26% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ and ITB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.04% vs 6.44% for ITB. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.04% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ITB.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 1.23% for ITB.
JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ITB is Building & Construction. JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.42% for ITB.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer