JEPQ vs. GDXJ
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 20.04%/yr vs 42.13%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -10.70% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -19.25%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 42.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.44% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -10.70% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -16.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and GDXJ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.28 |
The correlation between JEPQ and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JEPQ
GDXJ
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Industrials
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Utilities
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
JEPQ
GDXJ
Energy
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Financial Services
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
JEPQ
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
GDXJ
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEPQ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.20 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 1.43 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 3.72 | +10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEPQ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.00 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.05 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -88.66% | +68.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -35.60% | +26.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -35.60% | +15.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -34.94% | +32.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -60.48% | +57.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 13.67% | -11.86% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 3.65%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 17.66% | -14.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 42.71% | -33.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 50.84% | -38.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 41.34% | -24.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 44.15% | -27.48% |
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEPQ vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than GDXJ's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.26% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 3-year performance, GDXJ leads with 42.13% vs 20.04% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 42.13% return vs 20.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 2.61% for GDXJ.
JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GDXJ is Gold. JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.52% for GDXJ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer