JEPQ vs. ERNS.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and ERNS.L (iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while ERNS.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. JEPQ is passively managed, while ERNS.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 20.04%/yr vs 7.10%/yr for ERNS.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ERNS.L.

Performance

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

JEPQ is traded in USD, while ERNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ERNS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly higher than ERNS.L's 0.69% return.

JEPQ

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 25.85%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ERNS.L

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: 7.10%
• 5Y*: 2.47%
• 10Y*: 1.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.44%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-11.16%
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)	0.69%	12.75%	3.79%	10.28%	-1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ and ERNS.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022	0.31

The correlation between JEPQ and ERNS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 73
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ERNS.L

ERNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ERNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ERNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ERNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ERNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEPQ	ERNS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	0.44	+1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	0.68	+2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.08	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	0.71	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.33	1.58	+12.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ERNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ and ERNS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEPQ	ERNS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	0.44	+1.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.05	+0.91

Drawdowns

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum ERNS.L drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and ERNS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEPQ	ERNS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.07%	-34.17%	+14.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-4.13%	-4.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	-7.89%	-12.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-2.16%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-16.11%	+12.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	1.86%	-0.05%

Volatility

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) at 2.02%. This indicates that JEPQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEPQ	ERNS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	2.02%	+1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	4.95%	+4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	6.75%	+5.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.67%	8.63%	+8.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.67%	9.41%	+7.26%

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNS.L's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEPQ vs. ERNS.L - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than ERNS.L's 5.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)	5.65%	4.65%	5.42%	4.54%	1.14%	0.28%	0.75%	1.04%	0.74%	0.52%	0.81%	0.72%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.26%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEPQ and ERNS.L in my portfolio?

JEPQ and ERNS.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JEPQ or ERNS.L?

On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEPQ or ERNS.L?

ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

What is the main difference between JEPQ and ERNS.L?

JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ERNS.L is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.09% for ERNS.L.