JEPQ vs. ENFR
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 20.04%/yr vs 27.67%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.34% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 24.34%
- 6M
- 23.38%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 27.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.44% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.34% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | -3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and ENFR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.30 |
The correlation between JEPQ and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JEPQ
ENFR
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
JEPQ
ENFR
-
Communication Services
JEPQ
ENFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
JEPQ
ENFR
-
Consumer Defensive
JEPQ
ENFR
-
Healthcare
JEPQ
ENFR
-
Industrials
JEPQ
ENFR
Utilities
JEPQ
ENFR
Basic Materials
JEPQ
ENFR
-
Energy
JEPQ
ENFR
Financial Services
JEPQ
ENFR
Real Estate
JEPQ
ENFR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
ENFR
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEPQ | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.30 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 2.99 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 8.07 | +6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEPQ | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.77 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.34 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -68.28% | +48.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.64% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -15.58% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -5.15% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -15.97% | +12.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.20% | -1.39% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 3.65%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 5.78% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 11.41% | -1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 14.64% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 19.29% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 24.68% | -8.01% |
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JEPQ and ENFR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
JEPQ vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than ENFR's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.03% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.26% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ and ENFR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 3-year performance, ENFR leads with 27.67% vs 20.04% for JEPQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 27.67% return vs 20.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ and ENFR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 4.03% for ENFR.
JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ENFR is Energy Equities. JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and SS&C.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer