JBL vs. MU
JBL (Jabil Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — JBL in Electronic Components, MU in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, JBL returned 35.40%/yr vs 55.03%/yr for MU. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JBL vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBL achieves a 59.70% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 232.74% return. Over the past 10 years, JBL has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 35.40%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.03% annualized return.
JBL
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 59.70%
- 6M
- 61.54%
- 1Y
- 106.33%
- 3Y*
- 57.02%
- 5Y*
- 45.20%
- 10Y*
- 35.40%
MU
- 1D
- 9.87%
- 1M
- 27.11%
- YTD
- 232.74%
- 6M
- 284.77%
- 1Y
- 776.52%
- 3Y*
- 144.94%
- 5Y*
- 65.39%
- 10Y*
- 55.03%
JBL vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBL Jabil Inc. | 59.70% | 58.73% | 13.25% | 87.43% | -2.55% | 66.40% | 3.89% | 68.49% | -4.41% | 12.17% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 232.74% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBL and MU is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1993 | 0.41 |
The correlation between JBL and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
JBL:
$39.16B
MU:
$1.08T
JBL:
$7.47
MU:
$21.26
JBL:
48.75
MU:
44.66
JBL:
2.61
MU:
0.17
JBL:
1.21
MU:
18.53
JBL:
29.14
MU:
14.94
JBL:
$32.67B
MU:
$58.12B
JBL:
$2.95B
MU:
$33.96B
JBL:
$1.55B
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBL vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
JBL
MU
JBL vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jabil Inc. (JBL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBL | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.81 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.99 | 25.90 | -19.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | 100.37 | -84.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBL | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 11.44 | -8.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 1.11 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.31 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
JBL vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBL drawdown since its inception was -94.92%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBL and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBL | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.92% | -98.25% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.86% | -30.28% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.83% | -57.63% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.83% | -57.63% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.34% | -57.63% | +0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -12.07% | +7.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.52% | -58.19% | +13.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.89% | 7.80% | -0.91% |
Volatility
JBL vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jabil Inc. (JBL) is 13.15%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 34.16%. This indicates that JBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBL | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.15% | 34.16% | -21.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.41% | 56.74% | -24.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.78% | 68.70% | -26.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.80% | 52.91% | -15.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.12% | 49.99% | -12.87% |
Dividends
JBL vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBL Jabil Inc. | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.45% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.37% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
JBL vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jabil Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JBL vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
JBL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 8.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.0%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
JBL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
JBL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 223.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JBL and MU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to JBL (13.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBL dropped -94.92% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JBL and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer