JAAA vs. REZ
JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) and REZ (iShares Residential Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while REZ is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index. JAAA is actively managed, while REZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JAAA returned 4.80%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for REZ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for REZ.
Performance
JAAA vs. REZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than REZ's 8.03% return.
JAAA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- —
REZ
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
JAAA vs. REZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 1.95% | 5.16% | 7.43% | 8.59% | 0.49% | 1.39% | 0.79% |
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 8.03% | 4.80% | 12.73% | 10.97% | -28.31% | 47.86% | 12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAAA and REZ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAAA vs. REZ — Risk / Return Rank
JAAA
REZ
JAAA vs. REZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAAA | REZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.77 | 1.13 | +1.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.24 | 1.18 | +12.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 71.21 | 3.59 | +67.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAAA | REZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.15 | 0.71 | +5.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.88 | 0.20 | +2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.78 | 0.24 | +2.54 |
Drawdowns
JAAA vs. REZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum REZ drawdown of -66.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and REZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAAA | REZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -66.87% | +64.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.39% | -8.76% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.46% | -18.39% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.64% | -35.05% | +32.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.16% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -12.68% | +12.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 2.87% | -2.80% |
Volatility
JAAA vs. REZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) is 0.13%, while iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that JAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAAA | REZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | 4.85% | -4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.64% | 10.94% | -10.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 14.50% | -13.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.68% | 18.94% | -17.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.64% | 21.53% | -19.89% |
JAAA vs. REZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than REZ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAAA vs. REZ - Dividend Comparison
JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than REZ's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 4.99% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 2.13% | 2.74% | 2.26% | 2.94% | 3.37% | 1.81% | 3.17% | 2.90% | 3.63% | 3.57% | 5.55% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAAA and REZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REZ has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAA dropped -2.64% vs REZ's -66.87%.
On 5-year performance, JAAA leads with 4.80% vs 3.77% for REZ. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JAAA has performed better with a 4.80% return vs 3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REZ.
JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.13% for REZ.
JAAA is categorized as CLO, while REZ is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JAAA and 0.48% for REZ.
JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.15 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAAA and REZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer