J vs. PWR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

J (Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, J returned 11.93%/yr vs 40.58%/yr for PWR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

J vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, J achieves a -8.91% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, J has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 11.93%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 40.58% annualized return.

J

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: -8.91%
• 6M: -13.86%
• 1Y: -5.06%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: 1.56%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

PWR

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -6.87%
• YTD: 64.46%
• 6M: 49.89%
• 1Y: 92.19%
• 3Y*: 56.18%
• 5Y*: 49.77%
• 10Y*: 40.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

J vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.	-8.91%	2.13%	24.23%	9.02%	-13.12%	28.60%	22.36%	54.99%	-10.58%	16.98%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	64.46%	33.70%	46.60%	51.70%	24.63%	59.50%	77.74%	35.84%	-22.93%	12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between J and PWR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 1998	0.49

The correlation between J and PWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS J : $2.83 PWR : $7.29
PE Ratio J : 42.38 PWR : 95.17
PEG Ratio J : 7.62 PWR : 4.72
PS Ratio J : 0.82 PWR : 3.51
Total Revenue (TTM) J : $13.17B PWR : $29.99B
Gross Profit (TTM) J : $3.08B PWR : $4.08B
EBITDA (TTM) J : $845.72M PWR : $2.40B

Return for Risk

J vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

J

J Risk / Return Rank: 34
J Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
J Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
J Omega Ratio Rank: 31
J Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
J Martin Ratio Rank: 36

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 93
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

J vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	J	PWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	2.55	-2.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	3.28	-3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.43	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	7.45	-7.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.33	17.97	-18.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

J vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current J Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of J and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	J	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16	2.55	-2.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	1.41	-1.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	1.21	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.35	+0.03

Drawdowns

J vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum J drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for J and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	J	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.14%	-97.07%	+22.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.44%	-12.45%	-21.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.44%	-33.89%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.44%	-33.89%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.33%	-45.53%	+6.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.45%	-11.64%	-14.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.17%	-46.86%	+20.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.22%	5.15%	+10.07%

Volatility

J vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) have volatilities of 11.34% and 11.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	J	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.34%	11.16%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.75%	29.60%	-4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.33%	36.37%	-5.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.05%	35.62%	-9.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.79%	33.70%	-5.91%

Dividends

J vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

J's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.	1.13%	1.96%	0.76%	0.80%	0.77%	0.60%	0.70%	0.76%	1.03%	0.91%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.06%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%	0.00%

Financials

J vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

J - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 794.89M and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

J - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of -81.18M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

J - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of -175.69M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both J and PWR in my portfolio?

J and PWR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, J or PWR?

J has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to PWR (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, J dropped -74.14% vs PWR's -97.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.