PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXG vs. PRGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXG vs. PRGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than PRGSX's 16.26% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has underperformed PRGSX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while PRGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.13% annualized return.


IXG

1D
0.04%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.78%
6M
4.64%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
12.22%

PRGSX

1D
-5.35%
1M
0.01%
YTD
16.26%
6M
16.21%
1Y
34.05%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
16.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXG vs. PRGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
0.78%28.54%25.69%14.97%-8.97%25.07%-2.99%24.60%-16.33%23.78%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
16.26%21.42%16.80%25.70%-28.01%9.81%52.29%35.84%-4.51%32.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IXG and PRGSX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2001

0.78

The correlation between IXG and PRGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXG vs. PRGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXG
IXG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXG vs. PRGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXGPRGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.77

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

11.24

-7.19

IXG vs. PRGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the PRGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXG and PRGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXGPRGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.88

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.44

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.82

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.52

-0.27

Drawdowns

IXG vs. PRGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than PRGSX's maximum drawdown of -64.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and PRGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXGPRGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.42%

-64.06%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-12.77%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

-21.13%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

-38.11%

+10.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.47%

-38.11%

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-6.08%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-13.48%

-6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

3.14%

+0.07%

Volatility

IXG vs. PRGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 3.69%, while T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXGPRGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

7.75%

-4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

15.88%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

18.76%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

19.80%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

19.84%

+0.29%

IXG vs. PRGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXG vs. PRGSX - Dividend Comparison

IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than PRGSX's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
2.03%2.04%2.64%2.62%3.71%1.69%2.13%2.87%3.14%2.12%2.21%2.79%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
8.26%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXG and PRGSX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGSX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to IXG (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXG dropped -78.42% vs PRGSX's -64.06%.

PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXG and PRGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer