IWY vs. VGT
IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWY returned 19.28%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
IWY vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 19.28%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.14% annualized return.
IWY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 4.27%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
VGT
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 24.57%
- 6M
- 21.33%
- 1Y
- 50.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.24%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- 25.14%
IWY vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 4.27% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.57% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWY and VGT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IWY and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWY vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWY
VGT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
IWY
VGT
Communication Services
IWY
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
IWY
VGT
Healthcare
IWY
VGT
Financial Services
IWY
VGT
Industrials
IWY
VGT
Consumer Defensive
IWY
VGT
-
Utilities
IWY
VGT
-
Real Estate
IWY
VGT
-
Basic Materials
IWY
VGT
Energy
IWY
VGT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWY vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
IWY
VGT
IWY vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWY | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.09 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 9.77 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWY | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 2.35 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.83 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 1.02 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.67 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
IWY vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWY | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.68% | -54.63% | +21.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -16.40% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.22% | -27.23% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.68% | -35.07% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.68% | -35.07% | +2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -6.77% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -7.95% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 5.17% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IWY vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) is 4.80%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that IWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWY | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 9.39% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 17.44% | -5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 21.58% | -5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 25.33% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 24.69% | -3.69% |
IWY vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWY vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWY and VGT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to IWY (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.14% vs 19.28% for IWY. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 19.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.
IWY and VGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.34%.
IWY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWY and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer