IWS vs. XDTE
IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) and XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index, while XDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. IWS is passively managed, while XDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, IWS returned 24.70% vs 22.20% for XDTE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWS charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for XDTE.
Performance
IWS vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than XDTE's 6.69% return.
IWS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
XDTE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWS vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 13.43% | 10.82% | 8.58% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 6.69% | 12.60% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWS and XDTE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IWS and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWS vs. XDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWS
XDTE
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
IWS
XDTE
Industrials
IWS
XDTE
Financial Services
IWS
XDTE
Consumer Cyclical
IWS
XDTE
Real Estate
IWS
XDTE
Energy
IWS
XDTE
Healthcare
IWS
XDTE
Utilities
IWS
XDTE
Basic Materials
IWS
XDTE
Consumer Defensive
IWS
XDTE
Communication Services
IWS
XDTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWS vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank
IWS
XDTE
IWS vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWS | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 2.90 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.38 | 13.13 | -0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWS | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.99 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.16 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
IWS vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and XDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWS | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -19.09% | -43.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -7.68% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -2.61% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -2.31% | -5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.69% | +0.31% |
Volatility
IWS vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWS | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 3.50% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 8.68% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 11.25% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 13.92% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 13.92% | +5.45% |
IWS vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWS vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison
IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than XDTE's 33.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.36% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 33.68% | 39.16% | 20.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWS and XDTE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XDTE has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to IWS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs XDTE's -19.09%.
On 1-year performance, IWS leads with 24.70% vs 22.20% for XDTE. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWS has performed better with a 24.70% return vs 22.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for XDTE.
XDTE has the higher dividend yield at 33.68%, compared with 1.36% for IWS.
IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.97% for XDTE.
XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWS and XDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer