PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than XDTE's 6.69% return.


IWS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.01%
YTD
13.43%
6M
13.77%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
10.08%

XDTE

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
6.69%
6M
6.52%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
13.43%10.82%8.58%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
6.69%12.60%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and XDTE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.72

The correlation between IWS and XDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWS vs. XDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
XDTE

Technology

18.2%
35.6%

Industrials

16.5%
8.3%

Financial Services

13.7%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.1%

Real Estate

8.2%
1.9%

Energy

7.7%
3.5%

Healthcare

7.5%
8.5%

Utilities

6.5%
2.4%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.0%
11.2%

Technology

IWS
18.2%
XDTE
35.6%

Industrials

IWS
16.5%
XDTE
8.3%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
XDTE
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
XDTE
10.1%

Real Estate

IWS
8.2%
XDTE
1.9%

Energy

IWS
7.7%
XDTE
3.5%

Healthcare

IWS
7.5%
XDTE
8.5%

Utilities

IWS
6.5%
XDTE
2.4%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
XDTE
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
XDTE
4.9%

Communication Services

IWS
3.0%
XDTE
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWSXDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.90

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

13.13

-0.75

IWS vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the XDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and XDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWSXDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.99

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.16

-0.74

Drawdowns

IWS vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and XDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-19.09%

-43.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-7.68%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-2.61%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-2.31%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.69%

+0.31%

Volatility

IWS vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.50%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

8.68%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

11.25%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

13.92%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

13.92%

+5.45%

IWS vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWS vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than XDTE's 33.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.36%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
33.68%39.16%20.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and XDTE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XDTE has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to IWS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs XDTE's -19.09%.

On 1-year performance, IWS leads with 24.70% vs 22.20% for XDTE. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWS has performed better with a 24.70% return vs 22.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for XDTE.

XDTE has the higher dividend yield at 33.68%, compared with 1.36% for IWS.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.97% for XDTE.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and XDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer