PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.08%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.


IWS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.01%
YTD
13.43%
6M
13.77%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
10.08%

VWO

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.73%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
13.43%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
8.50%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and VWO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.70

The correlation between IWS and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWS vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
VWO

Technology

18.2%
29.6%

Industrials

16.5%
8.0%

Financial Services

13.7%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.7%

Real Estate

8.2%
2.2%

Energy

7.7%
4.6%

Healthcare

7.5%
3.9%

Utilities

6.5%
2.9%

Basic Materials

5.4%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
7.1%

Technology

IWS
18.2%
VWO
29.6%

Industrials

IWS
16.5%
VWO
8.0%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
VWO
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
VWO
10.7%

Real Estate

IWS
8.2%
VWO
2.2%

Energy

IWS
7.7%
VWO
4.6%

Healthcare

IWS
7.5%
VWO
3.9%

Utilities

IWS
6.5%
VWO
2.9%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
VWO
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
VWO
3.7%

Communication Services

IWS
3.0%
VWO
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWSVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.18

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

7.79

+4.59

IWS vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWSVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.49

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.27

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.45

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.26

+0.16

Drawdowns

IWS vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-67.68%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-11.17%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-17.37%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-32.60%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-36.39%

-7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-4.67%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-15.81%

+7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

3.12%

-1.12%

Volatility

IWS vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 3.45%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

6.29%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

13.80%

-4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

16.37%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

17.45%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

19.23%

+0.14%

IWS vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.36%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and VWO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to IWS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.08% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.36% for IWS.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.08% for VWO.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer