IWS vs. VWO
IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWS returned 10.08%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for VWO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWS charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
IWS vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.08%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
IWS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
IWS vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 13.43% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWS and VWO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IWS and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWS vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWS
VWO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
IWS
VWO
Industrials
IWS
VWO
Financial Services
IWS
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
IWS
VWO
Real Estate
IWS
VWO
Energy
IWS
VWO
Healthcare
IWS
VWO
Utilities
IWS
VWO
Basic Materials
IWS
VWO
Consumer Defensive
IWS
VWO
Communication Services
IWS
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWS vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
IWS
VWO
IWS vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWS | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 2.18 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.38 | 7.79 | +4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWS | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.49 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.27 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.45 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.26 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
IWS vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWS | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -67.68% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -11.17% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -17.37% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -32.60% | +11.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -36.39% | -7.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -4.67% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -15.81% | +7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.12% | -1.12% |
Volatility
IWS vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 3.45%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWS | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 6.29% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 13.80% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 16.37% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 17.45% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 19.23% | +0.14% |
IWS vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWS vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.36% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWS and VWO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to IWS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.08% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.36% for IWS.
IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.08% for VWO.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWS and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer