PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than IWMY's 10.55% return.


IWS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.01%
YTD
13.43%
6M
13.77%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
10.08%

IWMY

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
10.55%
6M
8.47%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
13.43%10.82%12.91%18.96%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
10.55%10.18%5.56%10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and IWMY is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023

0.84

The correlation between IWS and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWSIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.71

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

5.59

+6.79

IWS vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWSIWMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.23

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.90

-0.48

Drawdowns

IWS vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-18.72%

-43.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-11.57%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-2.89%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-2.98%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

3.53%

-1.53%

Volatility

IWS vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 3.45%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

6.26%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

13.20%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

16.15%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

15.90%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

15.90%

+3.47%

IWS vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWS vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than IWMY's 46.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
46.29%63.33%107.92%11.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.36%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and IWMY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to IWS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, IWS leads with 24.70% vs 19.66% for IWMY. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWS has performed better with a 24.70% return vs 19.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.29%, compared with 1.36% for IWS.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.99% for IWMY.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer