PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 2.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has outperformed FUTY with an annualized return of 10.08%, while FUTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.


IWS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.01%
YTD
13.43%
6M
13.77%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
10.08%

FUTY

1D
-1.86%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.06%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
13.43%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.65%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and FUTY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.48

The correlation between IWS and FUTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWS vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
FUTY

Technology

18.2%

-

Industrials

16.5%
0.2%

Financial Services

13.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Real Estate

8.2%

-

Energy

7.7%
0.5%

Healthcare

7.5%

-

Utilities

6.5%
99.2%

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Communication Services

3.0%

-

Technology

IWS
18.2%
FUTY

-

Industrials

IWS
16.5%
FUTY
0.2%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
FUTY

-

Real Estate

IWS
8.2%
FUTY

-

Energy

IWS
7.7%
FUTY
0.5%

Healthcare

IWS
7.5%
FUTY

-

Utilities

IWS
6.5%
FUTY
99.2%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
FUTY

-

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
FUTY

-

Communication Services

IWS
3.0%
FUTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWSFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.19

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

2.64

+9.74

IWS vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWSFUTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

0.74

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.47

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.55

-0.13

Drawdowns

IWS vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-36.44%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.93%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-17.35%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-25.11%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-36.44%

-7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-7.74%

+5.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-6.03%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

4.03%

-2.03%

Volatility

IWS vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 3.45%, while Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

5.64%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

11.56%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

14.40%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

17.10%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

19.06%

+0.31%

IWS vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than FUTY's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.63%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.36%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and FUTY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to IWS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.08% vs 8.88% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.36% for IWS.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.08% for FUTY.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer