PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWR vs. VEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWR vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than VEU's 11.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IWR has outperformed VEU with an annualized return of 11.41%, while VEU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.


IWR

1D
0.08%
1M
1.05%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.50%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
11.41%

VEU

1D
0.90%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.84%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWR vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
10.71%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
11.45%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%21.83%-14.18%27.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IWR and VEU is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2007

0.81

The correlation between IWR and VEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWR vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWR
VEU

Industrials

18.4%
15.7%

Technology

17.2%
18.5%

Financial Services

12.5%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
8.2%

Healthcare

8.7%
7.1%

Energy

7.2%
5.2%

Real Estate

7.0%
2.0%

Utilities

6.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.3%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.4%
4.6%

Industrials

IWR
18.4%
VEU
15.7%

Technology

IWR
17.2%
VEU
18.5%

Financial Services

IWR
12.5%
VEU
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IWR
11.2%
VEU
8.2%

Healthcare

IWR
8.7%
VEU
7.1%

Energy

IWR
7.2%
VEU
5.2%

Real Estate

IWR
7.0%
VEU
2.0%

Utilities

IWR
6.1%
VEU
3.2%

Basic Materials

IWR
4.3%
VEU
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IWR
4.1%
VEU
5.1%

Communication Services

IWR
3.4%
VEU
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWR vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWR vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWRVEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.41

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

9.28

-0.19

IWR vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWR and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWRVEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.74

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.51

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.25

+0.24

Drawdowns

IWR vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, roughly equal to the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and VEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRVEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.78%

-61.52%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-11.43%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

-13.69%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-29.31%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

-34.98%

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-3.69%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-13.13%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.96%

-0.84%

Volatility

IWR vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 3.59%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRVEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

6.07%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

13.65%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

15.80%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

16.16%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.38%

17.25%

+2.13%

IWR vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWR vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than VEU's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.17%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.68%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWR and VEU have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEU has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to IWR (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs VEU's -61.52%.

On 10-year performance, IWR leads with 11.41% vs 9.86% for VEU. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWR has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 9.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.17% for IWR.

IWR is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VEU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index, while VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWR and 0.04% for VEU.

VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWR and VEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer