IWR vs. TNBMX
IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) and TNBMX (T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)) are both funds - IWR is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while TNBMX is a Global Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, IWR returned 7.68%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for TNBMX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for TNBMX.
Performance
IWR vs. TNBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than TNBMX's 0.74% return.
IWR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
TNBMX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
IWR vs. TNBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 10.71% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 7.68% |
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | 0.74% | 5.25% | 5.00% | 10.32% | -12.30% | -1.63% | 5.73% | 10.77% | 1.72% | 1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and TNBMX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.10 |
The correlation between IWR and TNBMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWR vs. TNBMX — Risk / Return Rank
IWR
TNBMX
IWR vs. TNBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWR | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.85 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 6.28 | +2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWR | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.69 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.40 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.86 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
IWR vs. TNBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, which is greater than TNBMX's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and TNBMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWR | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -15.78% | -43.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -2.32% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | -2.32% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -15.48% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -0.63% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -3.06% | -4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 0.68% | +1.44% |
Volatility
IWR vs. TNBMX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) at 0.81%. This indicates that IWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWR | TNBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 0.81% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 2.15% | +7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 2.54% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 3.63% | +14.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 3.32% | +16.06% |
IWR vs. TNBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TNBMX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWR vs. TNBMX - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than TNBMX's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) | 4.79% | 4.76% | 4.24% | 2.85% | 10.20% | 2.84% | 1.90% | 4.65% | 8.20% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWR and TNBMX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWR has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to TNBMX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs TNBMX's -15.78%.
TNBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWR and TNBMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer