IWR vs. JPM
IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IWR returned 11.41%/yr vs 20.32%/yr for JPM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IWR vs. JPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's -2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, IWR has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 11.41%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.32% annualized return.
IWR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
JPM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 16.72%
- 10Y*
- 20.32%
IWR vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 10.71% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 18.25% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | -2.52% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -6.62% | 26.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and JPM is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2001 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IWR and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWR vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank
IWR
JPM
IWR vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWR | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.26 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 2.98 | +6.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWR | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 0.90 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.69 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.74 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.34 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
IWR vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and JPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWR | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -76.16% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -15.47% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | -24.42% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -38.77% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | -43.63% | +3.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -6.55% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -17.62% | +9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 6.50% | -4.38% |
Volatility
IWR vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 3.59%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWR | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 6.40% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 17.38% | -7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 21.62% | -8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 24.45% | -6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 27.40% | -8.02% |
Dividends
IWR vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than JPM's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.90% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWR and JPM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPM has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to IWR (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs JPM's -76.16%.
IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWR and JPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer