IWR vs. ABVE
IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while ABVE (Above Food Ingredients Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, IWR returned 19.23% vs -88.53% for ABVE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IWR vs. ABVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWR achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than ABVE's -93.01% return.
IWR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
ABVE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -81.90%
- YTD
- -93.01%
- 6M
- -95.63%
- 1Y
- -88.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWR vs. ABVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 10.71% | 10.37% | 9.88% |
ABVE Above Food Ingredients Inc | -93.01% | 201.85% | -91.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWR and ABVE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWR vs. ABVE — Risk / Return Rank
IWR
ABVE
IWR vs. ABVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) and Above Food Ingredients Inc (ABVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWR | ABVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | -0.91 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | -1.42 | +10.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWR | ABVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | -0.21 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | -0.27 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
IWR vs. ABVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWR drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, smaller than the maximum ABVE drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWR and ABVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWR | ABVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -97.84% | +39.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -97.84% | +89.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -97.84% | +95.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -73.39% | +65.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 62.25% | -60.13% |
Volatility
IWR vs. ABVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) is 3.59%, while Above Food Ingredients Inc (ABVE) has a volatility of 166.45%. This indicates that IWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWR | ABVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 166.45% | -162.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 201.15% | -191.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 413.54% | -400.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 322.36% | -304.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 322.36% | -302.98% |
Dividends
IWR vs. ABVE - Dividend Comparison
IWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while ABVE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABVE Above Food Ingredients Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWR and ABVE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABVE has higher volatility (166.45%) compared to IWR (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWR dropped -58.78% vs ABVE's -97.84%.
IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWR and ABVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer