IWO vs. VWO
IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWO returned 11.06%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for VWO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWO charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
IWO vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWO achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IWO has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 11.06%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
IWO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 32.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
IWO vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 14.48% | 12.90% | 15.04% | 18.51% | -26.27% | 2.54% | 34.68% | 28.48% | -9.43% | 22.25% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWO and VWO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.67 |
The correlation between IWO and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWO vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWO
VWO
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
IWO
VWO
Industrials
IWO
VWO
Healthcare
IWO
VWO
Financial Services
IWO
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
IWO
VWO
Basic Materials
IWO
VWO
Energy
IWO
VWO
Consumer Defensive
IWO
VWO
Communication Services
IWO
VWO
Real Estate
IWO
VWO
Utilities
IWO
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWO vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
IWO
VWO
IWO vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWO | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.18 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 7.79 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWO | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.49 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.27 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
IWO vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWO | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -67.68% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.87% | -11.17% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.57% | -17.37% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.51% | -32.60% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -36.39% | -5.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -4.67% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -15.81% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.12% | +1.03% |
Volatility
IWO vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.29%. This indicates that IWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWO | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 6.29% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.25% | 13.80% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.81% | 16.37% | +5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 17.45% | +7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 19.23% | +4.94% |
IWO vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWO vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWO and VWO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWO has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to VWO (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWO dropped -60.11% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, IWO leads with 11.06% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWO has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWO.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.41% for IWO.
IWO is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWO and 0.08% for VWO.
IWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWO and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer