IWO vs. JNK
IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and JNK (SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index, while JNK is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWO returned 11.06%/yr vs 4.94%/yr for JNK. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWO charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JNK.
Performance
IWO vs. JNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWO achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than JNK's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IWO has outperformed JNK with an annualized return of 11.06%, while JNK has yielded a comparatively lower 4.94% annualized return.
IWO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 32.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
JNK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
IWO vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 14.48% | 12.90% | 15.04% | 18.51% | -26.27% | 2.54% | 34.68% | 28.48% | -9.43% | 22.25% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 1.30% | 8.76% | 7.71% | 12.42% | -12.19% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 14.88% | -3.28% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWO and JNK is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IWO and JNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWO vs. JNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWO
JNK
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IWO
JNK
Industrials
IWO
JNK
-
Healthcare
IWO
JNK
-
Financial Services
IWO
JNK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWO
JNK
-
Basic Materials
IWO
JNK
-
Energy
IWO
JNK
Consumer Defensive
IWO
JNK
-
Communication Services
IWO
JNK
-
Real Estate
IWO
JNK
-
Utilities
IWO
JNK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWO vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank
IWO
JNK
IWO vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.80 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 12.30 | -4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.83 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.48 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.42 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IWO vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWO drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than JNK's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWO and JNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -38.48% | -21.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.87% | -2.51% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.57% | -5.02% | -23.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.51% | -16.67% | -23.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -22.89% | -19.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -0.46% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -3.70% | -13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 0.57% | +3.58% |
Volatility
IWO vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) at 1.12%. This indicates that IWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWO | JNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 1.12% | +6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.25% | 3.00% | +13.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.81% | 3.84% | +17.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.56% | 7.55% | +17.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 8.31% | +15.86% |
IWO vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWO has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWO vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison
IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than JNK's 6.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
JNK SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF | 6.64% | 6.54% | 6.63% | 6.38% | 6.06% | 4.27% | 5.11% | 5.44% | 5.90% | 5.60% | 6.06% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWO and JNK have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWO has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to JNK (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWO dropped -60.11% vs JNK's -38.48%.
On 10-year performance, IWO leads with 11.06% vs 4.94% for JNK. On fees, IWO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWO has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.
JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.41% for IWO.
IWO is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JNK is High Yield Bonds. IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWO and 0.40% for JNK.
JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWO and JNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer