IWN vs. XOM
IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.05%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for XOM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IWN vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 27.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWN having a 10.05% annualized return and XOM not far behind at 10.04%.
IWN
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 16.90%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
XOM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 27.80%
- 6M
- 32.61%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
IWN vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 16.90% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 27.80% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and XOM is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IWN and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWN vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
IWN
XOM
IWN vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWN | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.21 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.56 | 8.97 | +6.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWN | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.07 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.90 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.36 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.48 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
IWN vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWN | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -62.40% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -15.69% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -18.92% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -20.51% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.08% | -61.34% | +15.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -10.90% | +8.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -10.20% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 5.61% | -3.09% |
Volatility
IWN vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is 5.31%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that IWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWN | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 9.20% | -3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 20.29% | -8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.99% | 24.44% | -6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 26.73% | -5.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 28.19% | -4.78% |
Dividends
IWN vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than XOM's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.69% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWN and XOM have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to IWN (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs XOM's -62.40%.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWN and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer