PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWN vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWN vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than USHY's 1.29% return.


IWN

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
16.90%
6M
16.09%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
10.05%

USHY

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.85%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWN vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
16.90%12.40%7.63%14.56%-14.77%27.96%4.66%22.01%-13.01%1.95%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.29%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and USHY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.62

The correlation between IWN and USHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWN vs. USHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWN
USHY

Financial Services

24.2%

-

Technology

12.4%

-

Industrials

11.1%

-

Real Estate

10.2%
0.8%

Energy

9.2%
99.2%

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Utilities

5.7%

-

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Financial Services

IWN
24.2%
USHY

-

Technology

IWN
12.4%
USHY

-

Industrials

IWN
11.1%
USHY

-

Real Estate

IWN
10.2%
USHY
0.8%

Energy

IWN
9.2%
USHY
99.2%

Healthcare

IWN
8.8%
USHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWN
8.7%
USHY

-

Utilities

IWN
5.7%
USHY

-

Basic Materials

IWN
5.4%
USHY

-

Consumer Defensive

IWN
2.0%
USHY

-

Communication Services

IWN
1.6%
USHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWN vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN
IWN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWN vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWNUSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

2.83

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

12.68

+2.88

IWN vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWNUSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.88

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.57

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.58

-0.19

Drawdowns

IWN vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than USHY's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWNUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-22.44%

-39.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-2.43%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-4.66%

-22.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-15.56%

-11.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-0.41%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-2.66%

-7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

0.54%

+1.98%

Volatility

IWN vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that IWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWNUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

1.13%

+4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

2.95%

+9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

3.67%

+14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

7.34%

+14.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.41%

8.25%

+15.16%

IWN vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWN vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than USHY's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.46%1.70%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.93%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWN and USHY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWN has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to USHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 5-year performance, IWN leads with 6.08% vs 4.16% for USHY. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWN has performed better with a 6.08% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.93%, compared with 1.46% for IWN.

IWN is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USHY is High Yield Bonds. IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for IWN and 0.15% for USHY.

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWN and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer