PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMY vs. PNNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMY vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMY achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -30.57% return.


IWMY

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
10.55%
6M
8.47%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PNNT

1D
-1.30%
1M
-15.02%
YTD
-30.57%
6M
-29.01%
1Y
-33.64%
3Y*
0.71%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMY vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
10.55%10.18%5.56%10.06%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
-30.57%-2.96%16.56%14.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMY and PNNT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMY vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PNNT
PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMY vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMYPNNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.78

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

-0.79

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.59

-1.69

+7.28

IWMY vs. PNNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the PNNT Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMY and PNNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMYPNNTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

-1.25

+2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.13

+0.77

Drawdowns

IWMY vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMY drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMY and PNNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMYPNNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-82.16%

+63.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-42.61%

+31.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-40.90%

+38.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-15.28%

+12.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

19.92%

-16.39%

Volatility

IWMY vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) is 6.26%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that IWMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMYPNNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

14.65%

-8.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

23.99%

-10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

27.16%

-11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

23.80%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

32.77%

-16.87%

Dividends

IWMY vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison

IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.29%, more than PNNT's 25.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
46.29%63.33%107.92%11.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
25.20%16.11%12.85%11.65%10.43%6.93%11.71%11.03%11.30%10.42%14.62%18.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMY and PNNT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNNT has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to IWMY (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMY dropped -18.72% vs PNNT's -82.16%.

IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMY and PNNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer