PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWM vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWM vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 10.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWM having a 10.78% annualized return and VYMI not far behind at 10.62%.


IWM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
15.62%
6M
13.83%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
10.78%

VYMI

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
10.04%
6M
13.58%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWM vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
15.62%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
10.04%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-1.11%18.43%-12.65%22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IWM and VYMI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2016

0.69

The correlation between IWM and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWM vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWM
VYMI

Technology

19.5%
4.3%

Industrials

17.2%
6.6%

Healthcare

16.1%
6.6%

Financial Services

15.6%
41.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
6.5%

Energy

5.8%
9.5%

Real Estate

5.6%
1.3%

Basic Materials

4.5%
6.8%

Utilities

3.0%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
7.0%

Communication Services

2.1%
4.0%

Technology

IWM
19.5%
VYMI
4.3%

Industrials

IWM
17.2%
VYMI
6.6%

Healthcare

IWM
16.1%
VYMI
6.6%

Financial Services

IWM
15.6%
VYMI
41.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWM
7.9%
VYMI
6.5%

Energy

IWM
5.8%
VYMI
9.5%

Real Estate

IWM
5.6%
VYMI
1.3%

Basic Materials

IWM
4.5%
VYMI
6.8%

Utilities

IWM
3.0%
VYMI
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

IWM
2.1%
VYMI
7.0%

Communication Services

IWM
2.1%
VYMI
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWM vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWM vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.76

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

10.83

+0.61

IWM vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMVYMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.14

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.80

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.63

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.64

-0.28

Drawdowns

IWM vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than VYMI's maximum drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-40.00%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-10.14%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-12.84%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

-24.05%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-40.00%

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-2.52%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-6.31%

-4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.58%

+0.53%

Volatility

IWM vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 3.69%. This indicates that IWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

3.69%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

10.94%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.53%

13.13%

+6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

14.87%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

16.88%

+6.19%

IWM vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWM vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VYMI's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.89%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.48%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWM and VYMI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to VYMI (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWM dropped -59.05% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.78% vs 10.62% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.78% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.89% for IWM.

IWM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWM and 0.07% for VYMI.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWM and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer