PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWM vs. EUNY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWM is traded in USD, while EUNY.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNY.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than EUNY.DE's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IWM has outperformed EUNY.DE with an annualized return of 10.78%, while EUNY.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.38% annualized return.


IWM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
15.62%
6M
13.83%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
10.78%

EUNY.DE

1D
-0.45%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
10.16%
6M
12.47%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
15.62%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%
EUNY.DE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
10.16%28.66%5.96%19.01%-30.20%10.52%-3.07%15.81%-6.18%26.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IWM and EUNY.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2012

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWM vs. EUNY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNY.DE
EUNY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EUNY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMEUNY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

4.80

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

13.42

-1.98

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the EUNY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and EUNY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMEUNY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.06

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.25

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.41

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.18

+0.18

Drawdowns

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than EUNY.DE's maximum drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and EUNY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMEUNY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-48.41%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-5.73%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-14.74%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

-40.81%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-40.81%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-3.96%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-15.76%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.05%

+1.06%

Volatility

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (EUNY.DE) at 5.13%. This indicates that IWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMEUNY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

5.13%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

11.02%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.53%

13.37%

+6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

17.37%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

17.83%

+5.24%

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNY.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWM vs. EUNY.DE - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than EUNY.DE's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNY.DE
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF
5.32%5.82%7.72%8.04%9.56%6.35%5.09%5.57%5.65%4.09%4.35%6.37%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.89%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWM and EUNY.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUNY.DE.

IWM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EUNY.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index, while EUNY.DE tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Select Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IWM and 0.65% for EUNY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWM and EUNY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer