PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWM vs. BATS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWM vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWM is traded in USD, while BATS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWM achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than BATS.L's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, IWM has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 10.78%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.61% annualized return.


IWM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
15.62%
6M
13.83%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
10.78%

BATS.L

1D
1.53%
1M
2.50%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.64%
1Y
33.10%
3Y*
32.48%
5Y*
17.13%
10Y*
6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWM vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
15.62%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
6.61%68.15%34.95%-19.48%14.47%8.11%-6.84%43.84%-50.14%24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IWM and BATS.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.26

The correlation between IWM and BATS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWM vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWM vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWMBATS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.36

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

5.67

+5.77

IWM vs. BATS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the BATS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and BATS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWMBATS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.44

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.79

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.27

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.26

+0.10

Drawdowns

IWM vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, roughly equal to the maximum BATS.L drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and BATS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMBATS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-56.29%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-13.98%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-14.60%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

-30.31%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

-56.29%

+15.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-10.37%

+7.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-17.59%

+6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

5.82%

-2.71%

Volatility

IWM vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is 6.52%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that IWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMBATS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

9.64%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

18.51%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.53%

22.90%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.58%

21.79%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

24.86%

-1.79%

Dividends

IWM vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than BATS.L's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.40%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.89%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWM and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWM and BATS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer