IVLU vs. VRIG
IVLU (iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF) and VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value, while VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. IVLU is passively managed, while VRIG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVLU returned 13.74%/yr vs 4.44%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
IVLU vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than VRIG's 1.87% return.
IVLU
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
IVLU vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF | 10.99% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.87% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVLU and VRIG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.12 |
IVLU vs. VRIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVLU
VRIG
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IVLU
VRIG
Industrials
IVLU
VRIG
Technology
IVLU
VRIG
Healthcare
IVLU
VRIG
-
Basic Materials
IVLU
VRIG
Consumer Cyclical
IVLU
VRIG
Consumer Defensive
IVLU
VRIG
Energy
IVLU
VRIG
-
Communication Services
IVLU
VRIG
-
Utilities
IVLU
VRIG
Real Estate
IVLU
VRIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVLU vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
IVLU
VRIG
IVLU vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVLU | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -21.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 5.29 | -3.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 62.49 | -59.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 318.26 | -307.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVLU | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 10.08 | -7.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 3.46 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.91 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
IVLU vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and VRIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVLU | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -13.04% | -28.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -0.08% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.48% | -0.78% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -2.28% | -23.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | 0.00% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -0.27% | -8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 0.02% | +3.05% |
Volatility
IVLU vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.11%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVLU | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 0.11% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 0.36% | +12.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 0.50% | +14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 1.29% | +15.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 3.80% | +13.87% |
IVLU vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IVLU and VRIG have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
IVLU vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than VRIG's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF | 3.34% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVLU and VRIG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVLU has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs VRIG's -13.04%.
On 5-year performance, IVLU leads with 13.74% vs 4.44% for VRIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 13.74% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVLU and VRIG have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.34% for IVLU.
IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VRIG is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.08 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVLU and VRIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer