IVLU vs. MNA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IVLU (iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF) and MNA (IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value, while MNA is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVLU returned 11.09%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for MNA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVLU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for MNA.

Performance

IVLU vs. MNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than MNA's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has outperformed MNA with an annualized return of 11.09%, while MNA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.

IVLU

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 32.63%
• 3Y*: 23.34%
• 5Y*: 13.74%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

MNA

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: 1.83%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVLU vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF	10.99%	46.09%	6.76%	20.07%	-5.73%	15.60%	-4.50%	15.60%	-15.10%	23.10%
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF	1.79%	8.59%	4.93%	0.18%	-1.61%	-3.24%	2.72%	4.70%	2.13%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and MNA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2015	0.33

The correlation between IVLU and MNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVLU vs. MNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVLU	MNA
Financial Services	25.3%	11.4%
Industrials	17.2%	22.3%
Technology	11.3%	8.3%
Healthcare	9.7%	11.3%
Basic Materials	7.5%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	4.4%
Energy	5.1%	-
Communication Services	4.0%	9.2%
Utilities	3.3%	15.3%
Real Estate	1.5%	5.1%

Return for Risk

IVLU vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVLU

IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 69
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MNA

MNA Risk / Return Rank: 41
MNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MNA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MNA Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVLU vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVLU	MNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	0.95	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	1.41	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.17	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.22	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.66	7.99	+2.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVLU vs. MNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the MNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and MNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVLU	MNA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	0.95	+1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.37	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.42	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.36	+0.11

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than MNA's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and MNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVLU	MNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.85%	-16.68%	-25.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.69%	-1.40%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.48%	-3.01%	-12.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	-10.45%	-15.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.85%	-16.68%	-25.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-0.55%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.59%	-2.83%	-5.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	0.56%	+2.51%

Volatility

IVLU vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) at 1.66%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVLU	MNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	1.66%	+2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	3.59%	+8.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	4.75%	+10.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.52%	4.98%	+11.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	6.55%	+11.12%

IVLU vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVLU vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF	3.34%	3.71%	4.46%	4.69%	3.59%	3.47%	2.05%	3.53%	2.82%	2.87%	2.53%	0.93%
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVLU and MNA in my portfolio?

IVLU and MNA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVLU or MNA?

IVLU has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to MNA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs MNA's -16.68%.

Which ETF is better, IVLU or MNA?

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.09% vs 2.74% for MNA. On fees, IVLU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MNA has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVLU or MNA?

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVLU or MNA?

IVLU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVLU or MNA?

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for MNA.

What is the main difference between IVLU and MNA?

IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MNA is Hedge Fund. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value, while MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.77% for MNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.