PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITOT vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITOT vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITOT achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ITOT has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 14.81%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.25% annualized return.


ITOT

1D
0.31%
1M
0.42%
YTD
9.09%
6M
8.99%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.81%

COST

1D
0.30%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
13.35%
6M
10.14%
1Y
-3.42%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
22.05%
10Y*
22.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITOT vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
9.09%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
13.35%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ITOT and COST is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2004

0.53

The correlation between ITOT and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITOT vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITOT vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITOTCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.98

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

-0.22

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.79

-0.51

+13.31

ITOT vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITOT and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITOTCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

-0.18

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.98

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

1.02

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.59

-0.02

Drawdowns

ITOT vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITOT drawdown since its inception was -55.20%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOT and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITOTCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-53.39%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-15.38%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-20.74%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-31.40%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-31.40%

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-10.93%

+8.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-13.36%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

7.15%

-5.20%

Volatility

ITOT vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) is 3.91%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that ITOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITOTCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

7.71%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

14.53%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

18.79%

-6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

22.71%

-5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

21.95%

-3.66%

Dividends

ITOT vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.00%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITOT and COST have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to ITOT (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITOT dropped -55.20% vs COST's -53.39%.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITOT and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer