PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITB vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 13.61%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.65% annualized return.


ITB

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-7.66%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
13.61%

SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
-3.71%-5.26%2.06%68.91%-26.26%49.25%26.42%48.70%-30.92%59.65%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ITB and SCHD is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.61

The correlation between ITB and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITB vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITB
SCHD

Consumer Cyclical

71.8%
6.3%

Industrials

19.1%
7.5%

Basic Materials

8.6%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

19.2%

Energy

-

16.2%

Financial Services

-

9.3%

Healthcare

-

18.8%

Technology

-

16.4%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ITB
71.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Industrials

ITB
19.1%
SCHD
7.5%

Basic Materials

ITB
8.6%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

ITB
0.5%
SCHD

-

Communication Services

ITB

-

SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

ITB

-

SCHD
19.2%

Energy

ITB

-

SCHD
16.2%

Financial Services

ITB

-

SCHD
9.3%

Healthcare

ITB

-

SCHD
18.8%

Technology

ITB

-

SCHD
16.4%

Utilities

ITB

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITB
ITB Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITBSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.43

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

5.74

-5.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

14.06

-13.81

ITB vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITB Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITB and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITBSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

2.43

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.59

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.76

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.86

-0.75

Drawdowns

ITB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITBSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-33.37%

-53.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-4.61%

-21.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-16.13%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.55%

-16.85%

-23.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.10%

-33.37%

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.00%

-1.64%

-25.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-3.32%

-33.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.28%

1.88%

+11.40%

Volatility

ITB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that ITB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITBSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

2.83%

+4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.24%

7.60%

+12.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

10.94%

+18.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.19%

14.38%

+14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.00%

16.72%

+13.28%

ITB vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
1.23%1.67%0.46%0.48%0.86%0.37%0.46%0.50%0.63%0.28%0.43%0.34%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITB has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 13.61% vs 12.65% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ITB.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.23% for ITB.

ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while SCHD is Dividend. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ITB and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITB and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer