ITB vs. EWZ
ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) and EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while EWZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ITB returned 13.61%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for EWZ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITB charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWZ.
Performance
ITB vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITB achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than EWZ's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ITB has outperformed EWZ with an annualized return of 13.61%, while EWZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.
ITB
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -7.66%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
EWZ
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 28.14%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
ITB vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -3.71% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 6.04% | 48.81% | -30.41% | 32.62% | 12.09% | -17.32% | -20.35% | 27.67% | -2.52% | 23.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITB and EWZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.38 |
ITB vs. EWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITB
EWZ
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
ITB
EWZ
Industrials
ITB
EWZ
Basic Materials
ITB
EWZ
Real Estate
ITB
EWZ
-
Communication Services
ITB
-
EWZ
Consumer Defensive
ITB
-
EWZ
Energy
ITB
-
EWZ
Financial Services
ITB
-
EWZ
Healthcare
ITB
-
EWZ
Technology
ITB
-
EWZ
Utilities
ITB
-
EWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITB vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank
ITB
EWZ
ITB vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITB | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.47 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 4.96 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITB | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 1.13 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.14 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.22 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.16 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
ITB vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITB drawdown since its inception was -86.53%, which is greater than EWZ's maximum drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITB and EWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITB | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -77.25% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -19.27% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.35% | -31.36% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.55% | -32.24% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.10% | -56.99% | +4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.00% | -26.15% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | -35.95% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.28% | 5.68% | +7.60% |
Volatility
ITB vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) have volatilities of 7.16% and 7.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITB | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 7.32% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.24% | 20.79% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.41% | 25.12% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.19% | 27.68% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.00% | 34.07% | -4.07% |
ITB vs. EWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITB has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than EWZ's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITB vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison
ITB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than EWZ's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4.89% | 5.19% | 8.91% | 5.66% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 1.71% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 4.08% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.23% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITB and EWZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWZ has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to ITB (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITB dropped -86.53% vs EWZ's -77.25%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 13.61% vs 7.53% for EWZ. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, ITB has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.
EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 1.23% for ITB.
ITB is categorized as Building & Construction, while EWZ is Latin America Equities. ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index, while EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ITB and 0.59% for EWZ.
EWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITB and EWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer