ITA vs. MOOD
ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment. ITA is passively managed, while MOOD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ITA returned 26.35%/yr vs 19.89%/yr for MOOD. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITA charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MOOD.
Performance
ITA vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 12.64% return.
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 25.56%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.86%
MOOD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITA vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 5.92% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 16.14% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 12.64% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITA and MOOD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ITA and MOOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ITA vs. MOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITA
MOOD
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ITA
MOOD
Technology
ITA
MOOD
Basic Materials
ITA
-
MOOD
Communication Services
ITA
-
MOOD
Consumer Cyclical
ITA
-
MOOD
Consumer Defensive
ITA
-
MOOD
Energy
ITA
-
MOOD
Financial Services
ITA
-
MOOD
Healthcare
ITA
-
MOOD
Real Estate
ITA
-
MOOD
Utilities
ITA
-
MOOD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITA vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank
ITA
MOOD
ITA vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITA | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.45 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 10.67 | -6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITA | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.34 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.31 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
ITA vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and MOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITA | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.72% | -14.34% | -45.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -9.71% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -9.71% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.25% | -2.14% | -7.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -2.32% | -7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 3.13% | +2.76% |
Volatility
ITA vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 3.59%. This indicates that ITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITA | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 3.59% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 12.55% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 14.33% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 12.10% | +7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 12.10% | +11.07% |
ITA vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITA vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison
ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.47% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITA and MOOD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to MOOD (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITA dropped -59.72% vs MOOD's -14.34%.
On 3-year performance, ITA leads with 26.35% vs 19.89% for MOOD. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITA has performed better with a 26.35% return vs 19.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.
ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.
ITA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.68% for MOOD.
MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITA and MOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer