ISCF vs. ICLN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ISCF (iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISCF is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCF returned 8.95%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for ICLN. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISCF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.

Performance

ISCF vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 27.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCF has underperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 8.95%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.

ISCF

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 19.59%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: 7.07%
• 10Y*: 8.95%

ICLN

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -0.76%
• YTD: 27.81%
• 6M: 26.73%
• 1Y: 65.16%
• 3Y*: 5.80%
• 5Y*: 0.12%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCF vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF	5.86%	33.65%	4.75%	11.50%	-15.07%	13.31%	7.65%	26.32%	-18.76%	38.13%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	27.81%	47.05%	-25.72%	-20.41%	-5.43%	-24.18%	141.82%	44.36%	-9.03%	21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCF and ICLN is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015	0.59

The correlation between ISCF and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISCF vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISCF	ICLN
Industrials	23.3%	27.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	0.1%
Financial Services	12.3%	-
Basic Materials	11.2%	1.1%
Technology	10.5%	11.1%
Real Estate	8.8%	-
Healthcare	5.4%	-
Energy	4.8%	26.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	-
Communication Services	3.8%	-
Utilities	3.6%	32.8%

Return for Risk

ISCF vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCF

ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 41
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 43

ICLN

ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 80
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCF vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISCF	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.38	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.93	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	5.66	-3.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	16.11	-9.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISCF vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCF and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISCF	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	2.38	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.00	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.41	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	-0.09	+0.57

Drawdowns

ISCF vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and ICLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCF	ICLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.79%	-87.15%	+46.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-11.58%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.85%	-43.18%	+29.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.70%	-57.16%	+26.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.79%	-66.75%	+25.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	-42.82%	+38.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-66.59%	+58.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	4.06%	-1.01%

Volatility

ISCF vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) is 4.42%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that ISCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCF	ICLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	12.28%	-7.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	21.81%	-9.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	27.62%	-12.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	27.43%	-10.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	27.31%	-9.85%

ISCF vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISCF vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than ICLN's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	1.28%	1.63%	1.85%	1.59%	0.89%	1.18%	0.34%	1.36%	2.77%	2.49%	3.88%	2.36%
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF	3.55%	3.76%	4.29%	3.94%	2.73%	3.93%	2.30%	2.87%	2.14%	1.97%	2.89%	1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISCF and ICLN in my portfolio?

ISCF and ICLN have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISCF or ICLN?

ICLN has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to ISCF (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCF dropped -40.79% vs ICLN's -87.15%.

Which ETF is better, ISCF or ICLN?

On 10-year performance, ICLN leads with 11.27% vs 8.95% for ISCF. On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISCF or ICLN?

Over the 10-year period, ICLN has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISCF or ICLN?

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISCF or ICLN?

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.28% for ICLN.

What is the main difference between ISCF and ICLN?

ISCF is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISCF and 0.39% for ICLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.