PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) and ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS0E.DE achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than ASML.AS's 63.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IS0E.DE has underperformed ASML.AS with an annualized return of 13.92%, while ASML.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 33.95% annualized return.


IS0E.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
8.72%
1Y
63.71%
3Y*
38.14%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
13.92%

ASML.AS

1D
0.86%
1M
13.54%
YTD
63.16%
6M
56.08%
1Y
126.18%
3Y*
31.56%
5Y*
22.96%
10Y*
33.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS0E.DE
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF
-0.06%129.59%18.76%6.29%-3.80%-3.04%13.47%44.05%-4.38%-6.00%
ASML.AS
ASML Holding NV
63.16%37.08%0.36%36.66%-27.83%78.74%52.10%95.32%-4.67%37.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IS0E.DE and ASML.AS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012

0.11

The correlation between IS0E.DE and ASML.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS0E.DE
IS0E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IS0E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML.AS
ASML.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) and ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS0E.DEASML.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

8.17

-6.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

21.20

-15.75

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS0E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS0E.DE and ASML.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS0E.DEASML.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

3.23

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.98

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.54

-0.36

Drawdowns

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS0E.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.63%, smaller than the maximum ASML.AS drawdown of -89.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0E.DE and ASML.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS0E.DEASML.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.63%

-89.99%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.26%

-15.81%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.26%

-44.77%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

-47.93%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.62%

-47.93%

+2.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.93%

0.00%

-22.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.74%

-32.58%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.85%

6.13%

+4.72%

Volatility

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) and ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) have volatilities of 12.84% and 13.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS0E.DEASML.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.84%

13.42%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.62%

30.65%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.58%

39.95%

+7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.83%

38.44%

-4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.53%

34.12%

-1.59%

Dividends

IS0E.DE vs. ASML.AS - Dividend Comparison

IS0E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML.AS
ASML Holding NV
0.50%0.71%0.92%0.87%1.28%0.47%0.64%1.19%1.02%0.83%0.98%0.85%
IS0E.DE
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS0E.DE and ASML.AS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS0E.DE and ASML.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer