PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOO vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOO vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 16.53%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.


IOO

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.96%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
16.53%

GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
9.70%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and GLD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.12

The correlation between IOO and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IOO vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IOO
GLD

Technology

46.2%

-

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Financial Services

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Industrials

4.8%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
100.0%

Utilities

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

IOO
46.2%
GLD

-

Communication Services

IOO
11.0%
GLD

-

Financial Services

IOO
9.1%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

IOO
8.4%
GLD

-

Healthcare

IOO
8.4%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

IOO
5.6%
GLD

-

Industrials

IOO
4.8%
GLD

-

Energy

IOO
3.6%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

IOO
1.7%
GLD
100.0%

Utilities

IOO
0.5%
GLD

-

Real Estate

IOO
0.2%
GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOO vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOOGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.51

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

3.78

+11.87

IOO vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOOGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.13

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.98

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.79

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.59

-0.20

Drawdowns

IOO vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOOGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-45.56%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-20.10%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-20.10%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-21.03%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-22.00%

-9.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-19.89%

+16.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-16.16%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

8.01%

-5.85%

Volatility

IOO vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is 4.47%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that IOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOOGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

5.68%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

23.47%

-12.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

26.87%

-12.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

18.07%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

15.99%

+1.81%

IOO vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IOO and GLD have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

IOO vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.84%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


IOO and GLD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to IOO (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.53% vs 12.56% for GLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.53% return vs 12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IOO and GLD have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

IOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

IOO is categorized as Global Equities, while GLD is Gold. IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOO and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer