PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOO vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOO vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has outperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 16.53%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.25% annualized return.


IOO

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.96%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
16.53%

FXAIX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
8.42%
6M
8.48%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
15.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOO vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
9.70%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
8.42%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and FXAIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.94

The correlation between IOO and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOO vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOOFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.92

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

13.57

+2.08

IOO vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOOFXAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.13

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.79

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.85

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.81

-0.42

Drawdowns

IOO vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOOFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-33.79%

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-8.89%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-18.76%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-24.50%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-33.79%

+2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-2.94%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-3.79%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.91%

+0.25%

Volatility

IOO vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 3.81%. This indicates that IOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOOFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

3.81%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

9.41%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

12.19%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

16.95%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

18.08%

-0.28%

IOO vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOO vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FXAIX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.06%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.84%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IOO and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IOO has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to FXAIX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOO and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer