PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVA vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INVA vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVA achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -11.86% return. Over the past 10 years, INVA has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 7.00%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.31% annualized return.


INVA

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
11.71%
6M
6.33%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
7.00%

NFLX

1D
0.56%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
-11.86%
6M
-14.62%
1Y
-33.43%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
24.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVA vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
11.71%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%39.23%-12.50%-18.85%22.97%32.62%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-11.86%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between INVA and NFLX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.20

The correlation between INVA and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVA:

$1.89B

NFLX:

$355.22B

EPS

INVA:

$5.94

NFLX:

$3.09

PE Ratio

INVA:

3.76

NFLX:

26.73

PEG Ratio

INVA:

0.02

NFLX:

1.06

PS Ratio

INVA:

4.47

NFLX:

7.62

PB Ratio

INVA:

1.31

NFLX:

11.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVA:

$424.12M

NFLX:

$46.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVA:

$323.16M

NFLX:

$22.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

INVA:

$438.91M

NFLX:

$26.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVA vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVA vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INVANFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.82

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

-0.77

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

-1.36

+1.70

INVA vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVA and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INVANFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

-1.01

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.26

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.59

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.58

-0.52

Drawdowns

INVA vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVA drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVA and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVANFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-81.99%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.53%

-43.35%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-43.35%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-75.95%

+28.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.57%

-75.95%

+16.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.17%

-38.29%

+8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.65%

-24.90%

-19.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.21%

24.70%

-14.49%

Volatility

INVA vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 6.64%. This indicates that INVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVANFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

6.64%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

25.22%

-8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.81%

33.15%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.28%

43.10%

-15.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

41.52%

-7.63%

Dividends

INVA vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither INVA nor NFLX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

INVA vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviva, Inc. and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
97.99M
12.25B
(INVA) Total Revenue
(NFLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INVA and NFLX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INVA has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to NFLX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVA dropped -84.32% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVA and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer