INVA vs. META

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

INVA (Innoviva, Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. INVA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, INVA returned 7.00%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for META. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INVA vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVA achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than META's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, INVA has underperformed META with an annualized return of 7.00%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.

INVA

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 11.71%
• 6M: 6.33%
• 1Y: 3.48%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

META

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -3.98%
• YTD: -11.24%
• 6M: -12.06%
• 1Y: -15.84%
• 3Y*: 30.58%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: 17.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVA vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INVA Innoviva, Inc.	11.71%	15.22%	8.17%	21.06%	-23.19%	39.23%	-12.50%	-18.85%	22.97%	32.62%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-11.24%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between INVA and META is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.21

The correlation between INVA and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap INVA : $1.89B META : $1.50T
EPS INVA : $5.94 META : $27.47
PE Ratio INVA : 3.76 META : 21.31
PEG Ratio INVA : 0.02 META : 0.88
PS Ratio INVA : 4.47 META : 7.00
PB Ratio INVA : 1.31 META : 6.16
Total Revenue (TTM) INVA : $424.12M META : $214.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) INVA : $323.16M META : $176.14B
EBITDA (TTM) INVA : $438.91M META : $106.31B

Return for Risk

INVA vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVA

INVA Risk / Return Rank: 44
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 40
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 23
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
META Omega Ratio Rank: 22
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
META Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVA vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INVA	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	-0.45	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	-0.44	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.94	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	-0.48	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	-1.01	+1.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INVA vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVA and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INVA	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	-0.45	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.28	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.46	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.54	-0.49

Drawdowns

INVA vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVA drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVA and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	INVA	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.32%	-76.74%	-7.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.53%	-33.30%	+9.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.53%	-34.15%	+10.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.01%	-76.74%	+29.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.57%	-76.74%	+17.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.17%	-25.73%	-4.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.65%	-15.26%	-29.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.21%	15.69%	-5.48%

Volatility

INVA vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) is 7.62%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that INVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INVA	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	10.48%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.91%	26.95%	-10.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.81%	35.56%	-6.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.28%	44.05%	-16.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.89%	38.69%	-4.80%

Dividends

INVA vs. META - Dividend Comparison

INVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INVA Innoviva, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.12%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.36%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INVA and META in my portfolio?

INVA and META have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INVA or META?

META has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to INVA (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVA dropped -84.32% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.