PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVA vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INVA vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVA achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, INVA has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 7.00%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.


INVA

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
11.71%
6M
6.33%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
7.00%

JNJ

1D
-0.26%
1M
5.50%
YTD
13.43%
6M
16.43%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVA vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
11.71%15.22%8.17%21.06%-23.19%39.23%-12.50%-18.85%22.97%32.62%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
13.43%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between INVA and JNJ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVA:

$1.89B

JNJ:

$567.68B

EPS

INVA:

$5.94

JNJ:

$8.65

PE Ratio

INVA:

3.76

JNJ:

26.85

PEG Ratio

INVA:

0.02

JNJ:

0.89

PS Ratio

INVA:

4.47

JNJ:

5.86

PB Ratio

INVA:

1.31

JNJ:

6.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVA:

$424.12M

JNJ:

$96.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVA:

$323.16M

JNJ:

$66.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

INVA:

$438.91M

JNJ:

$31.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVA vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVA
INVA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
INVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVA vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INVAJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.57

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

4.91

-4.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

14.52

-14.17

INVA vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVA and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INVAJNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

3.19

-3.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.55

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.54

-0.49

Drawdowns

INVA vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVA drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVA and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVAJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-50.67%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.53%

-10.96%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-15.95%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-18.41%

-28.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.57%

-27.37%

-32.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.17%

-6.06%

-24.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.65%

-11.88%

-32.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.21%

3.70%

+6.51%

Volatility

INVA vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.80%. This indicates that INVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVAJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

5.80%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.91%

12.41%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.81%

16.87%

+11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.28%

16.87%

+10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

18.47%

+15.42%

Dividends

INVA vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

INVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.12%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.26%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

INVA vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innoviva, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
97.99M
24.06B
(INVA) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INVA and JNJ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INVA has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to JNJ (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVA dropped -84.32% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVA and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer