PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTU vs. CRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTU vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTU achieves a -53.65% return, which is significantly lower than CRM's -30.92% return. Over the past 10 years, INTU has outperformed CRM with an annualized return of 11.98%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


INTU

1D
2.95%
1M
-22.91%
YTD
-53.65%
6M
-53.22%
1Y
-60.08%
3Y*
-10.25%
5Y*
-7.58%
10Y*
11.98%

CRM

1D
-1.68%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-30.92%
6M
-29.37%
1Y
-33.00%
3Y*
-4.89%
5Y*
-4.74%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTU vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTU
Intuit Inc.
-53.65%6.09%1.16%61.76%-39.12%70.27%46.12%34.11%25.86%39.21%
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-30.92%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between INTU and CRM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2004

0.54

The correlation between INTU and CRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTU:

$84.32B

CRM:

$159.00B

EPS

INTU:

$16.37

CRM:

$8.59

PE Ratio

INTU:

18.66

CRM:

21.25

PEG Ratio

INTU:

1.12

CRM:

0.04

PS Ratio

INTU:

4.09

CRM:

3.98

PB Ratio

INTU:

4.09

CRM:

4.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTU:

$20.93B

CRM:

$42.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTU:

$16.97B

CRM:

$33.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTU:

$6.65B

CRM:

$12.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTU vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTU
INTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTU vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTUCRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

0.86

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.84

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.83

-1.62

-0.20

INTU vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTU Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTU and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTUCRMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.37

-0.88

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.13

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.24

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.45

-0.10

Drawdowns

INTU vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTU drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTU and CRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTUCRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.29%

-70.50%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.00%

-39.36%

-23.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.00%

-54.70%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.00%

-58.62%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.00%

-58.62%

-4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.90%

-49.87%

-12.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-16.12%

-8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.93%

20.48%

+12.45%

Volatility

INTU vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a higher volatility of 28.43% compared to Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) at 16.96%. This indicates that INTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTUCRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.43%

16.96%

+11.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.39%

31.74%

+10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.21%

37.87%

+6.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.47%

37.02%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.95%

35.36%

-1.41%

Dividends

INTU vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than CRM's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.92%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTU
Intuit Inc.
1.52%0.65%0.60%0.52%0.72%0.38%0.57%0.74%0.83%0.89%1.08%1.09%

Financials

INTU vs. CRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuit Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
8.56B
11.13B
(INTU) Total Revenue
(CRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INTU vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intuit Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

72.0%74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%84.0%86.0%20222023202420252026
84.6%
76.9%
Portfolio components
INTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

CRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

INTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.

CRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

INTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.

CRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INTU and CRM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTU has higher volatility (28.43%) compared to CRM (16.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTU dropped -75.29% vs CRM's -70.50%.

CRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTU and CRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer