INFA vs. CMI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

INFA (Informatica Inc.) and CMI (Cummins Inc.) are both stocks.

Performance

INFA vs. CMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Informatica Inc. (INFA) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

INFA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMI

• 1D: 3.30%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 32.64%
• 6M: 33.36%
• 1Y: 109.28%
• 3Y*: 46.82%
• 5Y*: 24.12%
• 10Y*: 22.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFA vs. CMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
INFA Informatica Inc.	0.00%
CMI Cummins Inc.	0.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap INFA : $7.70B CMI : $93.37B
EPS INFA : $0.03 CMI : $19.27
PE Ratio INFA : 727.98 CMI : 34.90
PS Ratio INFA : 4.53 CMI : 2.75
PB Ratio INFA : 3.14 CMI : 7.56
Total Revenue (TTM) INFA : $1.68B CMI : $33.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) INFA : $1.36B CMI : $8.60B
EBITDA (TTM) INFA : $323.83M CMI : $4.87B

Return for Risk

INFA vs. CMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMI

CMI Risk / Return Rank: 96
CMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CMI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CMI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFA vs. CMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Informatica Inc. (INFA) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFA	CMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.38	—

Drawdowns

INFA vs. CMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFA drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CMI drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFA and CMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFA	CMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-75.66%	+75.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.23%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.81%	+5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-22.23%	+22.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INFA	CMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	33.02%	-33.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	28.05%	-28.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	28.26%	-28.26%

Dividends

INFA vs. CMI - Dividend Comparison

INFA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMI Cummins Inc.	1.19%	1.50%	2.01%	2.71%	2.49%	2.57%	2.33%	2.74%	3.32%	2.38%	2.93%	3.99%
INFA Informatica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

INFA vs. CMI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Informatica Inc. and Cummins Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

INFA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a gross profit of 358.74M and revenue of 439.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.

CMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.24B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.

INFA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported an operating income of 60.87M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

CMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported an operating income of 949.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

INFA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a net income of 4.00M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

CMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a net income of 654.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.