PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDL vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDL vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDL achieves a -26.77% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, INDL has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of -0.54%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.


INDL

1D
-0.84%
1M
-10.88%
YTD
-26.77%
6M
-24.19%
1Y
-32.11%
3Y*
-0.75%
5Y*
-3.24%
10Y*
-0.54%

FBND

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.40%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDL vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
-26.77%-3.21%7.56%26.06%-22.88%40.26%-36.43%3.15%-34.29%127.98%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.10%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%-0.57%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between INDL and FBND is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014

0.10

The correlation between INDL and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INDL vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDL
FBND

Financial Services

28.3%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Industrials

10.3%
71.4%

Energy

9.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

8.6%

-

Technology

8.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Healthcare

6.1%

-

Communication Services

4.6%

-

Utilities

4.5%
27.5%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Financial Services

INDL
28.3%
FBND
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

INDL
12.4%
FBND

-

Industrials

INDL
10.3%
FBND
71.4%

Energy

INDL
9.4%
FBND
1.1%

Basic Materials

INDL
8.6%
FBND

-

Technology

INDL
8.2%
FBND

-

Consumer Defensive

INDL
6.3%
FBND

-

Healthcare

INDL
6.1%
FBND

-

Communication Services

INDL
4.6%
FBND

-

Utilities

INDL
4.5%
FBND
27.5%

Real Estate

INDL
1.4%
FBND

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDL vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDL
INDL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
INDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
INDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDL vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDLFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.25

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

2.01

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.80

5.97

-7.77

INDL vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDL Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDL and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDLFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.09

1.41

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.12

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

0.41

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.44

-0.56

Drawdowns

INDL vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDL drawdown since its inception was -95.67%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDL and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDLFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.67%

-17.25%

-78.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.82%

-2.66%

-35.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.64%

-5.94%

-41.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.64%

-17.25%

-30.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.96%

-17.25%

-74.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.39%

-1.82%

-77.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.36%

-3.35%

-63.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.90%

0.90%

+17.00%

Volatility

INDL vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that INDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDLFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.92%

1.23%

+8.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.60%

2.75%

+22.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.57%

3.80%

+25.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.60%

5.92%

+24.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.73%

6.10%

+46.63%

INDL vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDL has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDL vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

INDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.72%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
1.72%1.42%2.79%1.65%0.09%2.35%0.00%0.68%0.18%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDL and FBND have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDL has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDL dropped -95.67% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 10-year performance, FBND leads with 2.47% vs -0.54% for INDL. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FBND has performed better with a 2.47% return vs -0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for INDL.

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.72% for INDL.

INDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for INDL and 0.36% for FBND.

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDL and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer