INDA vs. XLB
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index, while XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDA returned 6.73%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for XLB. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
INDA vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 6.73%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
INDA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -12.65%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- 1Y
- -14.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
XLB
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- 1Y
- 16.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
INDA vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -12.65% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 10.66% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and XLB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between INDA and XLB has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
INDA vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
XLB
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDA
XLB
-
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
XLB
Industrials
INDA
XLB
Energy
INDA
XLB
-
Technology
INDA
XLB
-
Basic Materials
INDA
XLB
Consumer Defensive
INDA
XLB
-
Healthcare
INDA
XLB
-
Communication Services
INDA
XLB
-
Utilities
INDA
XLB
-
Real Estate
INDA
XLB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
XLB
INDA vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDA | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.17 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.30 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 4.02 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDA | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 0.95 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.27 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.35 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
INDA vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -59.83% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -12.38% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -23.17% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -24.72% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -37.27% | -7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.68% | -6.41% | -13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -10.84% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 4.00% | +3.88% |
Volatility
INDA vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) have volatilities of 5.11% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 5.32% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 13.02% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 16.95% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 18.96% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 20.66% | +0.46% |
INDA vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDA vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and XLB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLB has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to INDA (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs XLB's -59.83%.
On 10-year performance, XLB leads with 9.85% vs 6.73% for INDA. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLB has performed better with a 9.85% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XLB is Materials. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.13% for XLB.
XLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer