PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDA vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDA vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 7.47% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 6.73%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


INDA

1D
-0.27%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
-12.65%
6M
-11.06%
1Y
-14.02%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
6.73%

URA

1D
1.35%
1M
-16.78%
YTD
7.47%
6M
0.63%
1Y
43.02%
3Y*
33.80%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDA vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-12.65%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%-6.67%36.08%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
7.47%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between INDA and URA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.39

The correlation between INDA and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INDA vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDA
URA

Financial Services

28.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%

-

Industrials

10.3%
20.9%

Energy

9.5%
58.2%

Technology

8.3%
0.9%

Basic Materials

8.0%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Communication Services

4.7%

-

Utilities

4.6%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Financial Services

INDA
28.4%
URA

-

Consumer Cyclical

INDA
12.5%
URA

-

Industrials

INDA
10.3%
URA
20.9%

Energy

INDA
9.5%
URA
58.2%

Technology

INDA
8.3%
URA
0.9%

Basic Materials

INDA
8.0%
URA
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

INDA
6.2%
URA

-

Healthcare

INDA
6.2%
URA

-

Communication Services

INDA
4.7%
URA

-

Utilities

INDA
4.6%
URA
9.2%

Real Estate

INDA
1.4%
URA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDA vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDA vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDAURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.17

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

1.52

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.78

3.16

-4.94

INDA vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDA and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDAURADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

0.85

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.44

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.41

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

-0.07

+0.30

Drawdowns

INDA vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and URA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDAURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-93.54%

+48.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.69%

-28.43%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-37.81%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-37.90%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

-61.45%

+16.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.68%

-47.89%

+28.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-74.99%

+65.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

13.66%

-5.78%

Volatility

INDA vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 5.11%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 16.85%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDAURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

16.85%

-11.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

39.19%

-26.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

51.23%

-36.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

43.83%

-28.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

37.84%

-16.72%

INDA vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INDA and URA have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

INDA vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.54%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDA and URA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to INDA (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs URA's -93.54%.

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.57% vs 6.73% for INDA. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDA and URA have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDA and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer