INDA vs. SILJ
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDA returned 6.73%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.
Performance
INDA vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has underperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 6.73%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.
INDA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -12.65%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- 1Y
- -14.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
SILJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -17.04%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 79.14%
- 3Y*
- 43.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
INDA vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -12.65% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -4.81% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and SILJ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.24 |
INDA vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
SILJ
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDA
SILJ
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
SILJ
-
Industrials
INDA
SILJ
-
Energy
INDA
SILJ
-
Technology
INDA
SILJ
-
Basic Materials
INDA
SILJ
Consumer Defensive
INDA
SILJ
Healthcare
INDA
SILJ
-
Communication Services
INDA
SILJ
Utilities
INDA
SILJ
-
Real Estate
INDA
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
SILJ
INDA vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDA | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.26 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 2.29 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 5.48 | -7.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDA | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 1.43 | -2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.25 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.18 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.07 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
INDA vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -79.04% | +33.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -34.71% | +16.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -34.71% | +11.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -55.47% | +32.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -70.06% | +24.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.68% | -34.64% | +14.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -41.42% | +31.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 14.49% | -6.61% |
Volatility
INDA vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 5.11%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 20.06%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 20.06% | -14.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 46.73% | -33.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 55.89% | -41.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 44.60% | -29.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 46.33% | -25.21% |
INDA vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both INDA and SILJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.
Dividends
INDA vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.10% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and SILJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (20.06%) compared to INDA (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, SILJ leads with 8.17% vs 6.73% for INDA. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDA and SILJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SILJ is Silver. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer