INDA vs. GDXJ
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDA returned 6.73%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
INDA vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's -10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 6.73%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
INDA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -12.65%
- 6M
- -11.06%
- 1Y
- -14.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -19.25%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 42.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
INDA vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -12.65% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -10.70% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and GDXJ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.22 |
INDA vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
GDXJ
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDA
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
GDXJ
-
Industrials
INDA
GDXJ
-
Energy
INDA
GDXJ
-
Technology
INDA
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
INDA
GDXJ
Consumer Defensive
INDA
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
INDA
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
INDA
GDXJ
-
Utilities
INDA
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
INDA
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
GDXJ
INDA vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.20 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.43 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 3.72 | -5.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 1.00 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.39 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.26 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.05 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
INDA vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -88.66% | +43.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -35.60% | +16.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -35.60% | +12.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -50.99% | +28.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -57.77% | +12.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.68% | -34.94% | +15.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -60.48% | +50.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 13.67% | -5.79% |
Volatility
INDA vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 5.11%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 17.66% | -12.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 42.71% | -29.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 50.84% | -36.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 41.34% | -25.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 44.15% | -23.03% |
INDA vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDA vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to INDA (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 11.53% vs 6.73% for INDA. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.52% for GDXJ.
GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer