PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMBBY vs. MONY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc (MONY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMBBY is traded in USD, while MONY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MONY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMBBY achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly lower than MONY.L's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IMBBY has outperformed MONY.L with an annualized return of 3.85%, while MONY.L has yielded a comparatively lower -0.52% annualized return.


IMBBY

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
-9.65%
6M
-12.42%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
17.60%
10Y*
3.85%

MONY.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
0.77%
YTD
3.39%
6M
5.36%
1Y
-11.42%
3Y*
-3.02%
5Y*
-3.12%
10Y*
-0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
-9.65%38.90%47.56%0.53%22.09%14.14%-6.19%-10.65%-23.41%2.89%
MONY.L
Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc
3.39%10.04%-28.85%60.58%-15.60%-14.21%-15.44%31.44%-24.36%36.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IMBBY and MONY.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMBBY:

$29.52B

MONY.L:

£951.36M

EPS

IMBBY:

$5.30

MONY.L:

£0.30

PE Ratio

IMBBY:

6.97

MONY.L:

5.93

PEG Ratio

IMBBY:

2.79

MONY.L:

0.50

PS Ratio

IMBBY:

0.79

MONY.L:

1.08

PB Ratio

IMBBY:

7.32

MONY.L:

4.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMBBY:

$38.07B

MONY.L:

£885.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMBBY:

$13.55B

MONY.L:

£553.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMBBY:

$8.33B

MONY.L:

£266.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMBBY vs. MONY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMBBY
IMBBY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IMBBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMBBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMBBY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IMBBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMBBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MONY.L
MONY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MONY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MONY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MONY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MONY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MONY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) and Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc (MONY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMBBYMONY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.94

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

-0.33

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

-0.67

+0.70

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMBBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the MONY.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMBBY and MONY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMBBYMONY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

-0.45

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

-0.10

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

-0.02

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.09

+0.07

Drawdowns

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMBBY drawdown since its inception was -65.19%, smaller than the maximum MONY.L drawdown of -88.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMBBY and MONY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMBBYMONY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.19%

-88.85%

+23.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.45%

-34.10%

+15.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.89%

-38.01%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

-45.57%

+23.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.98%

-56.88%

-8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.67%

-32.96%

+16.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.21%

-31.84%

+5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

16.90%

-9.41%

Volatility

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc (MONY.L) at 5.87%. This indicates that IMBBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MONY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMBBYMONY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

5.87%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

22.41%

-6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.61%

25.60%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

31.32%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.33%

32.24%

-7.91%

Dividends

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Dividend Comparison

IMBBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than MONY.L's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMBBY
Imperial Brands PLC
5.88%5.37%6.04%7.62%7.03%8.58%9.92%10.41%7.93%5.03%4.54%0.00%
MONY.L
Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc
7.00%6.82%6.35%4.21%6.09%5.42%4.49%5.64%3.83%2.79%3.18%2.25%

Financials

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Brands PLC and Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
9.22B
221.00M
(IMBBY) Total Revenue
(MONY.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IMBBY values in USD, MONY.L values in GBp

IMBBY vs. MONY.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imperial Brands PLC and Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
33.0%
57.9%
Portfolio components
IMBBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Brands PLC reported a gross profit of 3.04B and revenue of 9.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

MONY.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc reported a gross profit of 127.90M and revenue of 221.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.9%.

IMBBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Brands PLC reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 9.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

MONY.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc reported an operating income of 56.20M and revenue of 221.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.4%.

IMBBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Brands PLC reported a net income of 482.14M and revenue of 9.22B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

MONY.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moneysupermarket.Com Group plc reported a net income of 35.30M and revenue of 221.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMBBY and MONY.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMBBY and MONY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer