IJR vs. SCHF
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 10.61%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for SCHF. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
IJR vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 12.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJR having a 10.61% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 10.24%.
IJR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 15.49%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
IJR vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 15.49% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 12.60% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and SCHF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IJR and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJR vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
SCHF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJR
SCHF
Industrials
IJR
SCHF
Technology
IJR
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
SCHF
Healthcare
IJR
SCHF
Real Estate
IJR
SCHF
Energy
IJR
SCHF
Basic Materials
IJR
SCHF
Communication Services
IJR
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
IJR
SCHF
Utilities
IJR
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
SCHF
IJR vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.47 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | 9.53 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.75 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.57 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
IJR vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -34.87% | -23.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -11.48% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -13.41% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -29.14% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -34.87% | -9.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -3.39% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -7.38% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.97% | -0.36% |
Volatility
IJR vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) is 4.73%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that IJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 6.09% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 13.94% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 16.25% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 16.48% | +4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 17.23% | +5.69% |
IJR vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IJR and SCHF have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJR vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than SCHF's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.04% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJR and SCHF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to IJR (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.61% vs 10.24% for SCHF. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR and SCHF have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.
IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer