IJR vs. IWR
IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) and IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while IWR is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJR returned 10.61%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for IWR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWR.
Performance
IJR vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJR achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than IWR's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IJR has underperformed IWR with an annualized return of 10.61%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
IJR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 15.49%
- 6M
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
IWR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
IJR vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 15.49% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 10.71% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJR and IWR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2001 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IJR and IWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJR vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJR
IWR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
IJR
IWR
Industrials
IJR
IWR
Technology
IJR
IWR
Consumer Cyclical
IJR
IWR
Healthcare
IJR
IWR
Real Estate
IJR
IWR
Energy
IJR
IWR
Basic Materials
IJR
IWR
Communication Services
IJR
IWR
Consumer Defensive
IJR
IWR
Utilities
IJR
IWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJR vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank
IJR
IWR
IJR vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJR | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.37 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | 9.09 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJR | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.43 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IJR vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJR drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, roughly equal to the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJR and IWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJR | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -58.78% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -8.17% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -21.09% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -26.18% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.36% | -40.59% | -3.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -2.04% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -7.80% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.12% | +0.49% |
Volatility
IJR vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 3.59%. This indicates that IJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJR | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 3.59% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.82% | 10.06% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 13.54% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 18.25% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 19.38% | +3.54% |
IJR vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IJR vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
IJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than IWR's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.15% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IJR and IWR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJR has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to IWR (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJR dropped -58.15% vs IWR's -58.78%.
On 10-year performance, IWR leads with 11.41% vs 10.61% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWR has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.
IWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.
IJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IWR is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IJR and 0.19% for IWR.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IJR and IWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer