PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJH vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJH vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJH achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 14.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IJH has outperformed RLY with an annualized return of 11.12%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.


IJH

1D
0.22%
1M
0.16%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.75%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
11.12%

RLY

1D
-0.06%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
14.36%
6M
16.24%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJH vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
12.55%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
14.36%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%15.63%-11.72%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IJH and RLY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between IJH and RLY has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IJH vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJH
RLY

Industrials

25.0%
16.5%

Technology

15.7%

-

Financial Services

14.4%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
2.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
0.8%

Real Estate

7.5%
5.4%

Energy

5.5%
30.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
25.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.6%

Utilities

3.1%
15.9%

Communication Services

1.0%

-

Industrials

IJH
25.0%
RLY
16.5%

Technology

IJH
15.7%
RLY

-

Financial Services

IJH
14.4%
RLY
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IJH
10.7%
RLY
2.6%

Healthcare

IJH
8.6%
RLY
0.8%

Real Estate

IJH
7.5%
RLY
5.4%

Energy

IJH
5.5%
RLY
30.1%

Basic Materials

IJH
4.8%
RLY
25.1%

Consumer Defensive

IJH
3.8%
RLY
3.6%

Utilities

IJH
3.1%
RLY
15.9%

Communication Services

IJH
1.0%
RLY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJH vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJH vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJHRLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

7.16

-4.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

25.86

-16.32

IJH vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJH and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJHRLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.73

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.73

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.36

+0.10

Drawdowns

IJH vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJH drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJH and RLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJHRLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-37.75%

-17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-3.93%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-10.08%

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-18.94%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

-34.17%

-8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-3.93%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-9.45%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

1.09%

+1.32%

Volatility

IJH vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.47%. This indicates that IJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJHRLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.47%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

8.46%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

10.34%

+5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.76%

13.57%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

13.83%

+7.36%

IJH vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJH vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

IJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than RLY's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.20%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.93%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


IJH and RLY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJH has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to RLY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJH dropped -55.07% vs RLY's -37.75%.

On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.12% vs 8.25% for RLY. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.20% for IJH.

IJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IJH and 0.50% for RLY.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJH and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer